Anne Arundel County cannot avoid arbitration.
That is the decision of Maryland’s Court of Special Appeals. In an unreported opinion dated December 27, 2011, the Court concluded that Teamsters Local 355 has a contractual right to arbitrate a dispute with the County concerning pay raises for Deputy Sheriffs. In 2009, the County had refused to arbitrate the dispute, despite clear language in the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. The Teamsters, through attorneys Keith Zimmerman and David Gray Wright of Kahn, Smith & Collins, P.A., took the County to court. The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County ordered the County to arbitrate the dispute. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the decision.
The dispute arose in 2009 when the County reneged on its agreement to provide certain wage and pay advancements to the Deputy Sheriffs. The County Executive specifically agreed not to attempt to circumvent the agreement. He then did just that. A dispute ensued and the Union filed a grievance. As was its right, the Union requested that the matter be referred to an independent arbitrator for resolution. The County refused to arbitrate the issue contending that it was not grievable. The Court of Special Appeals disagreed. It wrote: “the grievance was arbitrable and the arbitrator has jurisdiction to hear the dispute, as well as authority to grant the relief sought ….” The Court was clear: “Although an arbitrator cannot order the County Executive or County Council to exercise their budget and appropriation authority … an arbitrator can still award damages if it finds a breach of contract by a municipality or county.” These are the questions that will now be put to an arbitrator.
Keith Zimmerman argued the case on behalf of the Teamsters before both the Circuit Court and the Court of Special Appeals. David Gray Wright was on brief before the Court of Special Appeals.




